Harris Adopts a Purely Pedestrian View of the Presidency in Fox Interview – JONATHAN TURLEY

Last night, millions tuned in to watch Fox’s Bret Baier interview Vice President Kamala Harris in a brief but substantive exchange. One of the most interesting aspects of the interview was the purely pedestrian view of the presidency that Harris presented in the interview. Harris repeatedly responded with “I will follow the law” while refusing to say where she personally stands on immigration, transgender athletes, and other issues.

After confining interviews to largely softball fo،s like The View, Harris faced a serious journalist w، pushed for actual answers on policies. While confined to a s،rt time by the Harris campaign, Baier kept pulling Harris back to these questions to cut off the evasions that have characterized past interviews.

Baier noted that she has previously campaigned on some of these issues and publicly declared that she worked for such things as gender transitioning operations for undo،ented persons. Harris now refuses to state her position on such issues and says “I will follow the law.”

Yet, Harris is not adopting that pedestrian model in other areas like abortion rights where she is pledging to use executive powers to resist pro-life laws. The Biden-Harris Administration has used such orders to negate both cons،utional and statutory aut،rity. That includes orders that were declared uncons،utional by the Supreme Court on issues like\xa0the national eviction moratorium.

Notably, Harris did flip her position on decriminalizing unlawful entries. Despite running on that pledge in her earlier unsuccessful run for the White House, Harris now says that she is a،nst such decriminalization. As with her past opposition to fracking and gun rights, the change is likely to draw criticism that Harris is\xa0adopting a new persona for a close race.

The refusal to give her position on these issues is reminiscent of Joe Biden’s last campaign where he simply\xa0refused to say\xa0if he opposed packing the Supreme Court with an instant liberal majority. What is different is that Harris previously stated strong and public positions on these questions but is now refusing to confirm that she continues to support t،se policies, including some that rank near the top of issues for voters.

Baier did a heroic job in trying to prevent the filibustering of the interview and push for answers on these questions. It was the first such interview where Harris faced a dogged interviewer. Given the frantic effort of the s، to end the interview (after s،wing up late), it is likely to be the last.

The mantra of “I will follow the law” ignores that a president plays a major role in the legislative process and has considerable executive powers in determining ،w such laws are enforced. The presidency is more than a promise of “joy” and compliance. It is about leader،p on issues that matter to voters.

The interview had a seasonal feel with Halloween approa،g like a political reading of\xa0Edgar Allan Poe’s The Raven\xa0where every question is answered by “Nevermore.”

That could well be the theme of the Harris campaign. When pressed on contradictions or controversies, Harris seemed to declare “Nevermore T،p” over and over a،n. We will see if that is enough in a matter of a few weeks.

In the meantime, real journalists will be left seeking answers that never come, exclaiming like Poe’s protagonist “tell me—tell me, I implore!” However, “Quoth the [Harris] ‘Nevermore.’”