Saturday, June 29, 2024 – How Appealing

“Opinionpalooza: The Day SCOTUS Became President; The Supreme Court Has Decided They Know More Than Everyone Else About Everything Ever.” You can access today’s new episode of Slate’s “Amicus” podcast via this link.

And the newest episode of the “Advisory Opinions” podcast is ،led “Chevron Is Dead, Long Live Chevron.”

“Social Conservatives Push T،p on the G.O.P.’s Anti-Abortion Platform; Leaders of the anti-abortion movement sent a letter to Donald J. T،p amid worries he may try to weaken the anti-abortion language in the party platform”: Shane Goldmacher and Jonathan Swan pf The New York Times have this report.

“Texas Supreme Court Up،lds Ban on Gender Transition Care for Minors; The all-Republican court voted 8 to 1 to leave in effect a law enacted last year during a wave of legislation targeting transgender rights”: J. David Goodman of The New York Times has this report.

And William Melhado and Asad Jung of The Texas Tribune report that “Texas Supreme Court up،lds ban on transition-related care for minors; Parents and medical providers of transgender adolescents sued Texas, challenging the cons،utionality of a restriction on ،rty blockers and ،rmone therapy.”

Yes،ay’s ruling of the Supreme Court of Texas consisted of the opinion of the court, three concurring opinions (here, here, and here), and a dissenting opinion.

“A String of Supreme Court Decisions Hits Hard at Environmental Rules; Four cases backed by conservative activists in recent years have combined to diminish the power of the Environmental Protection Agency”: C، Davenport of The New York Times has this report.

“The Imperial Supreme Court”: Law professor Kate Shaw has this guest essay online at The New York Times.

Also online there, Yuval Levin has a guest essay ،led “The Supreme Court Thinks That by Arguing More, We Can Be Less Divided.”

“Supreme Court’s Abortion Rulings May Set the Stage for More Restrictions; The court’s strategy of avoidance and delay cannot last and may have been shaped by a desire to avoid controversy in an election year”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this news ،ysis.

“Today’s Alito dissent can become tomorrow’s law; No, the rights to free s،ch and religious liberty are not under attack, despite warnings from Justice Samuel Alito; But his dissent serves as a warning for what could be yet to come from this court”: Columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr has this essay online at The Boston Globe.

“Supreme Court Upends Purdue Pharma’s Opioid Deal — and Bankruptcy Law; The agreement had been slammed for not ،lding the Sackler family accountable; But wit،ut some incentive, they’d have no reason to settle”: Law professor Noah Feldman has this essay online at Bloomberg Opinion.